"If slaughterhouses had glass walls
everyone would be a vegetarian."  
Paul McCartney
A Wholistic and Futuristic Perspective
aken from the files of
renowned researcher and
Lamb, and co-authored by
Nadine Lalich,
this book
recounts in amazing detail
25  cases of close
page may contain
copyrighted material the
use of which has not been
specifically authorized by
the copyright owner. This
website distributes this
material without charge to
those who are interested
in receiving the included
information for research
and educational purposes.
We believe this constitutes
a fair use of any such
copyrighted material as
provided for in 17 U.S.C §
More UFOlogy
© 2008-2017 HB Publishing, LLC  
About This Site
mission of this site is to
research, gather and
provide information and
resources we believe
are crucial to the future
of humanity and our
planet. It is our desire to
not only
inform and
, but to also
our visitors to
participants of positive
together in growing
numbers, we can
promote the changes
necessary to ensure
our future is
wholesome, bright and
full of opportunity for all
of life on Earth. Every
effort will be made to
provide information
from a variety of reliable
sources.  New content
is added weekly.  
James Gilliland
More on Mind Control
Mind control (also known as brainwashing, reeducation, brainsweeping, coercive persuasion,
thought control, or thought reform) is a controversial pseudoscientific theory that human
subjects can be indoctrinated in a way that causes “an impairment of autonomy, an inability to
think independently, and a disruption of beliefs and affiliations. In this context, brainwashing
refers to the involuntary reeducation of basic beliefs and values”.

The following is a list of declassified documents pertaining to mind control and research
of the U.S. military and government. They have been provided through the efforts of

Interrogation: Science and Art
[371 Pages], December 2006 – U.S. military personnel and
intelligence officers in particular are expected to gain accurate information from detainees or
prisoners and thus need to know “what works” in “educing” information through interrogation,
strategic debriefing and information elicitation. This book presents the work of 13 specialists in
law, psychology, military intelligence, neuroscience, computer science, conflict management
and library science. The authors review what is known and not known about educing

Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans’ Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century,
08 December 1994 [58 Pages, 3.48MB] – During the last 50 years, hundreds of thousands of
military personnel have been involved in human experimentation and other intentional
exposures conducted by the Department of Defense (DOD), often without a service member’s
knowledge or consent. In some cases, soldiers who consented to serve as human subjects
found themselves participating in experiments quite different from those described at the time
they volunteered. For example, thousands of World War II veterans who originally volunteered
to ‘test summer clothing’ in exchange for extra leave time, found themselves in gas chambers
testing the effects of mustard gas and lewisite. Additionally, soldiers were sometimes ordered
by commanding officers to “volunteer” to participate in research or face dire consequences.
For example, several Persian Gulf War veterans interviewed by Committee staff reported that
they were ordered to take experimental vaccines during Operation Desert Shield or face
prison. The goals of many of the military experiments and exposures were very appropriate.
For example, some experiments were intended to provide important information about how to
protect U.S. troops from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons or other dangerous
substances during wartime. In the Persian Gulf War, U.S. troops were intentionally exposed to
an investigational vaccine that was intended to protect them against biological warfare, and
they were given pyridostigmine bromide pills in an experimental protocol intended to protect
them against chemical warfare.

Individual Rights and the Federal Role in Behavior Modification, November 1974 – A
Study Prepared by the Staff of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the
Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-third Congress, Second
. – A brief narrative description of the journal article, document, or resource. This
report responds to a directive issued to the Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights to
conduct an investigation into behavior modification programs, with particular emphasis on the
federal government’s involvement in the technology of behavior control and the implications of
this involvement for individual rights. Two basic considerations motivated the investigation:
first, the concern that the rights of human subjects of behavioral research are sufficiently
protected by adequate guidelines and review structures; and second, the question of whether
the federal government has any business participating in programs that may alter the
substance of individual freedom. Although the material included in this report is by no means
comprehensive, some initial findings are apparent: (1) there is widespread and growing
interest in the development of methods designed to predict, identify, control, and modify
individual behavior; (2) few measures are being taken to resolve questions of freedom,
privacy, and self-determination; (3) the Federal government is heavily involved in a variety of
behavior modification programs ranging from simple reinforcement techniques to
psychosurgery; and (4) a number of departments and agencies fund, participate in, or
sanction research involving various aspects of behavior modification.

Hypnosis In Intelligence, October 1966 [32 Pages, 4.91MB] – Hypnosis is one of the
oldest techniques for altering and controlling human behavior. A method that has had its share
of mistrust and professional neglect. Hypnosis in the past twenty years has been the subject of
serious inquiry and sustained interest.  During this time, and even before, professional
hypnotists have speculated on the possibilities of using hypnosis in warfare and in intelligence
work. They have proposed that hypnosis could be used to strengthen the psychological
defenses of captives and that it could be the means of gaining compliance from otherwise
uncooperative persons. This paper explores some of the operational implications of these