"If slaughterhouses had glass walls
everyone would be a vegetarian."  
Paul McCartney
A Wholistic and Futuristic Perspective
ALIEN EXPERIENCES
T
aken from the files of
renowned researcher and
psychotherapist,
Barbara
Lamb, and co-authored by
Nadine Lalich,
this book
recounts in amazing detail
25  cases of close
encounter.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This
page may contain
copyrighted material the
use of which has not been
specifically authorized by
the copyright owner. This
website distributes this
material without charge to
those who are interested
in receiving the included
information for research
and educational purposes.
We believe this constitutes
a fair use of any such
copyrighted material as
provided for in 17 U.S.C §
107.
UFO
Researchers
UFOLOGY
More UFOlogy
© 2008-2017 HB Publishing, LLC  
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
About This Site
OUR MISSION: This
mission of this site is to
research, gather and
provide information and
resources we believe
are crucial to the future
of humanity and our
planet. It is our desire to
not only
inform and
entertain
, but to also
inspire
our visitors to
become
active
participants of positive
change.
 Working
together in growing
numbers, we can
promote the changes
necessary to ensure
our future is
wholesome, bright and
full of opportunity for all
of life on Earth. Every
effort will be made to
provide information
from a variety of reliable
sources.  New content
is added weekly.  
James Gilliland
ETContact and Abduction Phenonemon

DO ALL UFO SIGHTINGS END IN ABDUCTION?

No.  Many more people see something unexplainable in the sky than are ever abducted.  A
casual view of something unknown in the sky does not necessarily portend abduction.  However,
there is growing belief that a very close sighting, (less than 300 feet), could well mean abduction.  
That is, if the craft is intentionally that close to a human, it is a likely probability.

DO PEOPLE KNOW IF THEY HAVE BEEN ABDUCTED?

Some do, some don’t.  It is an enigma why some folks vividly remember details of an abduction,
(consciously), and other folks need regression therapy to bring forward the facts.  In both cases,
once the abductee remembers the abduction there is no way to erase that memory from the
mind.  

WHAT DO YOU FEEL LIKE AFTER ABDUCTION?

Feelings vary just as personalities of humans are all different.  Emotions run the gamut from
abject terror to feeling loved and special for having been “chosen”.  Women, more than men, feel
used, abused and disgusted.  In many reports, women stress the emotional content of the
experience.  The pelvic examination given to most all women and the concept of being naked
while lying on a table can cause great anger.  Men, on the other hand, become angry when pain
is felt during the examination.  Men report less of an emotional response and more of a physical
response.  This all leads the abducted person to reflect on the invasion of privacy.

In general, the abducted person soon realizes that no matter how many locked doors or location
changes, that person can always be abducted again.  This, above all else, is the primal fear.  It is
the loss of control over your own being.  In no other earthly act is a person totally out of control of
his/her own actions and responses.  You can protect yourself against humans but you have no
defense against alien abduction.  This becomes even more painful when children are involved.

WHY ARE PEOPLE BEING ABDUCTED?

The short answer is that nobody knows, for certain.  There are many theories ranging from a long-
term study of humans, by the aliens, to the creation of a hybrid race of alien-human children.  
Some folks feel that the aliens wish to understand our emotions and feelings, which the aliens no
longer possess, as a race of beings.  Some folks think the aliens are here for our benefit.  One
thing is certain, abductions continue to happen, unabated.

IS THERE A WAY TO PREVENT ABDUCTION?

Many theories abound to prevent abduction such as wearing a metal helmet, lining home windows
with aluminum foil and invoking religion or religious icons to ward off visitations.  Prayer,
meditation, concentration, ancient Native American ceremonies, etc. have not been specifically
proven to prevent abduction.  Anger and violent outbursts, (fighting back, when possible), are not
effective either, as a complete deterrent.

WHEN DO CONTINUED ABDUCTIONS END FOR PEOPLE?

Dr. John Mack probably said it best:  “Abductions last from cradle to grave.”  Age, social status,
income, occupation and lifestyle are no deterrent to abduction.  It would seem that the aliens are
equal opportunity abductors.

WHAT TIME OF DAY ARE PEOPLE MOST OFTEN ABDUCTED?

Abductions, worldwide, have been reported throughout the twenty-four hour cycle.  However, in
the United States, the most reported times for abduction are between 11:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m.
while most people are sleeping.  Abducting folks from their beds seems to be the most popular
methodology presently in use by the grays.  The next most common abduction scenario appears
to be taking folks from or inside automobiles on rural highways, late at night.  Sometimes taking
all passengers or sometimes just taking a selected one.  The other occupants are “switched off”
or put in a state of sleep until the return of the abducted.

That said there are still abductions in daylight from homes, yards, parks, farms and even public
places.  There was an evening abduction from a high-rise apartment building in downtown
Manhattan, while witnesses observed from below, the woman being floated out of the window!
Many current and ancient sources suggest that UFOs and extraterrestrial beings have been
visiting the earth and interacting and the future of our planet. Most experiences happen to normal
men and women living average, responsible lives; they are simply ordinary people who have
experienced extraordinary circumstances. These individuals display such a compelling sincerity
and marked emotional response to their strange experiences that it is obvious they have
experienced some kind of anomalous event. As a visitor to this site, you may simply be curious
about this subject, or you may be a confirmed skeptic. You may also be someone who is
investigating unusual occurrences from your own life. Whatever the case may be, if you will allow
yourself to simply ponder the possibilities set forth on this web site, you will certainly find it to be
an intriguing and eye-opening adventure that may actually change the way you view reality.
Additional observations reported by many abductees regarding extraterrestrial
behaviors during contact.

Aliens can alter our perception of our surroundings.

Aliens can control what we think we see. They can appear to us in any number of guises, and
shapes.

Aliens can take us--our consciousness--out of our physical bodies, disable our control of our
bodies, install one of their own entities, and use our bodies as vehicles for their own activities
before returning our consciousness to our bodies.

Abductees recall being instructed and trained by aliens. This training may be in the form of
verbal or telepathic lessons, slide shows, or actual hands-on instruction in the operation of alien
technology.

Abductees report being taken to facilities in which they encounter not only aliens but also
normal-looking humans, sometimes in military uniforms, working with the alien captors.

Abductees often encounter more than one sort of alien during an experience, not just the grays.
Every possible combination of gray, reptoid, insectoid, blond, and widow's peak have been seen
during single abductions, aboard the same craft or in the same facility.

Aliens have forced ther human abductees to have sexual intercourse with aliens and even with
other abductees while groups of aliens observe these performances. In such encounters, the
aliens have sometimes disguised themselves in order to gain the cooperation of the abductee,
appearing in such forms as Jesus, the Pope, certain celebrities, and even the dead spouses of
the abductees.

Aliens perform extremely painful experiments or procedures on abductees, saying that these acts
are necessary but give no explanation why.....Painful genital and anal probes are performed, on
children as well as adults.

Aliens make predictions of an imminent period of global chaos and destruction. They say that a
certain number of humans...will be "rescued" from the planet in order to continue the species,
either on another planet or back on earth after the destruction is over
Alien Abductions in the Gingerbread House
by Karla K. Turner, Ph.D.

World renowned UFO researcher Jacques Vallee has repeatedly referred to the similarities between UFO and abduction reports
and the stories of folklore and fairy tales. I disagree with Dr. Vallee on many, many points of ufology, but here I will grant that
there is one fairy tale which does have something important to tell us about the alien abduction phenomenon. It is not, however,
what Dr. Vallee might think.

The story of Hansel and Gretel presents a lesson that every abductee should heed. These innocent children, wandering lost
and frightened in the forest, came upon a gingerbread house that seemed to offer them shelter and sustenance. The owner of
the house, a wizened old woman, was frightening to them at first, but their hunger pushed the children to accept her offer to
come inside and be fed.

They entered the gingerbread house and promptly became the old woman’s captives. Kept in cages, the two children were
abundantly fed. It was not for their benefit, though. In fact, they were being fattened up for the oven! The deceptive nature of
the gingerbread house and of the old woman’s offer of food worked quite well.

It is the deceptive quality of this story that holds a warning for humans who are abducted by aliens. Like Hansel and Gretel, we
are initially terrified by our encounter with aliens, but in too many cases, our fear is overcome by the words of our abductors and
by the thoughts and experiences they present to us.

I, too, am an abductee, and my quest to discover the nature of my own experiences led me into abduction research over the
past four years. Working with many other abduction cases, I have learned just how basic the deception of alien actions can be.

My family and I also delved into our own experiences, both past and present. Barbara Bartholic, a dedicated UFO investigator
from Tulsa, Oklahoma, worked closely with us and helped us fill in the gaps in our recollections of strange encounters through
hypnotic regression. Ms. Bartholic, by the way, began her own research as an assistant to Jacques Vallee in cattle mutilation
investigations, so her expertise in ufology is wide-ranging. I have recently written a book, Into the Fringe, about the startling and
often disturbing results of our personal investigations, and it [was] published by the Berkley Publishing Group in November 1992.

My interest soon expanded past the merely personal, and for the past several years I have worked as Ms. Bartholic’s research
associate, exploring literally hundreds of sighting and encounter cases with her. And what I’ve learned through this work has
raised far more questions than answers. In fact, it has taught me to be wary of those researchers who do claim to have answers.
I have yet to hear of a single theory or explanation that accounts for all of the data.

Some researchers have pointed out patterns of events in the abduction experience, such as the physical examination, the
taking of sperm and ova, and the later presentation of a hybrid baby to the abductee. Other patterns include the training of the
abductee in some way and the delivery of a warning of some upcoming global disaster. Yes, these events are frequently
reported, as one researcher has said in boring repetitious accounts, and it is tempting to think that the explanation for alien
abductions may lie in these patterns.

So the researchers announce that the problem is solved. The aliens are doing cross breeding experiments, ufologists tell us.
Never mind the overwhelming evidence against the viable commingling of different species. Or, we are told, the aliens are here
to save us from destroying ourselves and our planet through violence, drug use, epidemic disease, pollution, and resource
depletion. Never mind that these problems have grown worse, not better, since the ETs began visiting us.

Most infuriating of all, we are assured that there are no actual aliens, that our experiences spring from our own subconscious
turmoil or from our need for fantasy fulfillment. Never mind that many abductees are young children, too young to be suffering
from such psychological disturbances. Well, then, the resourceful researcher counters, the imagined aliens must spring from
some collective human super-psyche that is mirroring our failures and dangers back to us. This particular theory adores the
archetypal gray ET, because it resembles some sickly fetal form of humanity and must therefore be an objectified warning of
what our species is in danger of becoming if we don’t mend our ways. Never mind that many, many abductees have no dealing
with grays, but instead are victimized by robust reptoids and insectoid-type aliens. Not to mention the totally human-looking
blond beauties and black-headed, black-robed clan with the widow’s peak hairline.

No, too many researchers seem to find a theory and cling to it in spite of data that contradict it. And it is the ideas of these
researchers that dominate ufology. But if the public had access to the raw data, to the first-hand reports of abductees,
especially those unfamiliar with UFO-oriented books, magazines, and lecturers, they would find a much less neatly organized set
of patterns. These “virgin” cases – people uncontaminated by ufological literature – supply a staggering picture of human-alien
contact events.

What follows here is an overview of these “virgin” reports, a list of recurrent experiences that, taken together, gives us a close-
up view of what the aliens are doing here on earth. This data doesn’t tell us for certain just what sort of creatures the aliens are,
or what their purpose here may be. But it does tell us what humans are experiencing and what they are observing in the actions
and capabilities of the aliens. Every detail in the following list has been reported by more than one abductee, and in many cases
the details have turned up quite frequently.

ABDUCTION “CHECKLIST”

If these reports can be believed – and there is no reason to doubt the honesty of the reporters – the abduction phenomenon
includes the following details.

•Aliens can alter our perception of our surroundings.

•Aliens can control what we think we see. They can appear to us in any number of guises, and shapes.

•Aliens can take us–our consciousness–out of our physical bodies, disable our control of our bodies, install one of their own
entities, and use our bodies as vehicles for their own activities before returning our consciousness to our bodies.

•Aliens can be present with us in an invisible state and can make themselves only partially visible.

•Abductees receive marks on their bodies other than the well-known scoops and straight-line scars. These other marks include
single punctures, multiple punctures, large bruises, three and four-fingered claw marks, and triangles of every possible sort.

•Female abductees often suffer serious gynecological problems after their alien encounters, and sometimes these problems
lead to cysts, tumors, cancer of the breasts and uterus, and to hysterectomies.

•Aliens take body fluids from our necks, spines, blood veins, joints such as knees and wrists, and other places. They also inject
unknown fluids into various parts of our bodies.

•A surprising number of abductees suffer from serious illnesses they didn’t have before their encounters. These have led to
surgery, debilitation, and even death from causes the doctors can’t identify.

•Some abductees experience a degeneration of their mental, social, and spiritual well-being. Excessive behavior frequently
erupts, such as drug abuse, alcoholism, overeating, and promiscuity. Strange obsessions develop and cause the disruption of
normal life and the destruction of personal relationships.

•Aliens show a great interest in adult sexuality, child sexuality, and in inflicting physical pain on abductees.

•Abductees recall being instructed and trained by aliens. This training may be in the form of verbal or telepathic lessons, slide
shows, or actual hands-on instruction in the operation of alien technology.

•Abductees report being taken to facilities in which they encounter not only aliens but also normal-looking humans, sometimes in
military uniforms, working with the alien captors.

•Abductees often encounter more than one sort of alien during an experience, not just the grays. Every possible combination of
gray, reptoid, insectoid, blond, and widow’s peak have been seen during single abductions, aboard the same craft or in the
same facility.

•Abductee “virgin” cases – report being taken to underground facilities where they see grotesque hybrid creatures, nurseries of
hybrid humanoid fetuses, and vats of colored liquid filled with parts of human bodies.

•Abductees report seeing other humans in these facilities being drained of blood, being mutilated, flayed, and dismembered,
and being stacked, lifeless, like cords of wood. Some abductees have been threatened that they, too, will end up in this
condition if they don’t cooperate with their alien captors.

•Aliens come into homes and temporarily remove young children, leaving their distraught parents paralyzed and helpless. In
cases where a parent has been able to protest, the aliens insist that “The children belong to us.”

•Aliens have forced their human abductees to have sexual intercourse with aliens and even with other abductees while groups
of aliens observe these performances. In such encounters, the aliens have sometimes disguised themselves in order to gain the
cooperation of the abductee, appearing in such forms as Jesus, the Pope, certain celebrities, and even the dead spouses of the
abductees.

•Child abductees sometimes show a new and obsessive interest in their own genitalia after alien encounters, saying that their
abductors who come at night have been touching these parts of their bodies.

•Aliens perform extremely painful experiments or procedures on abductees, saying that these acts are necessary, but giving no
explanation why. Abductees’ eyes are painfully removed from the sockets, allowing the aliens to scrape the area or implant
devices into the area before the eyeballs are replaced, for instance. Some abductees are subjected to painful constrictions,
often around the head, chest and extremities. Painful genitalia and anal probes are performed, on children as well as adults.

•Aliens make predictions of an imminent period of global chaos and destruction. They say that a certain number of humans- -
and the number varies dramatically from case to case–will be “rescued” from the planet in order to continue the species, either
on another planet or back on earth after the destruction is over. Many abductees report that they don’t believe their alien
captors and foresee instead a much more sinister use of the “rescued” humans.

•In every instance from this list, there are multiple reports from unrelated cases, confirming that such bizarre details are not the
product of a single deranged mind. These details are convincing evidence that, contrary to the claims of many UFO
researchers, the abduction experience isn’t limited to a uniform pattern of events. This phenomenon simply can’t be explained in
terms of cross-breeding experiments or scientific research into the human physiology.

Spiritually Enlightened?

It becomes clear from these details that the beings who are doing such things can’t be seen as spiritually enlightened, with the
best interest of the human race in mind. Something else is going on, something far more painful and frightening, in many, many
abduction encounters.

There is a theory current in ufological research that says abductees who perceive their experiences in a negative way only do
so because they themselves aren’t spiritually or psychically advanced. Persons with higher cosmic development have positive
alien encounters, so the theory goes, and those who have painful or frightening experiences are merely spiritual Neanderthals.
This is a pet theory of researchers who claim that aliens, whether objectively real or not, serve as “mirrors” of our spiritual
nature, on an individual or a species-wide basis. Strieber has voiced this theory, for instance, in Majestic, where he says, “In the
eyes of the others [the aliens], we who met them saw ourselves. And there were demons there.”

Having worked with so many decent, honest, positively oriented abductees, however, I believe this theory is wrong. It is worse
than wrong – it is despicable, as despicable as blaming a rape victim for the violence committed against her. This attitude leaves
many abductees feeling doubly violated, first by the aliens who took them and then by the UFO researchers to whom they turn
for explanations and help.

Perhaps it is easy to understand why such a theory would be so popular. Humans have a deep need to believe in the power of
good. We need for the aliens to be a good force, since we feel so helpless in their presence. And we need for some superior
force to offer us a hope of salvation, both personally and globally, when we consider the sorry state of the world.

I think the aliens know this about us–they know that we want and hope for them to be benevolent creatures – and they use our
desire for goodness to manipulate us. What better way to gain our cooperation than to tell us that the things they are doing are
for our own good? Looking at the actions, the results of alien interference such as the long list above, there is a great
discrepancy between what we desire from them and what they are doing to us.

Not all abduction reports are filled with frightening or painful events, of course. Many people say that their alien encounters felt
benevolent, that their abductors treated them kindly or at least with a scientific detachment. Some abductees recall being told
that they were “special,” that they were “chosen,” and that they have an important task to perform for the benefit of humanity.

Given such a positive message, the abductees may ignore the fear and the pain of their encounters and insist to themselves
and to others that a higher motive underlies the abduction experience. And, in some cases, all that an abductee remembers is a
benevolent encounter, and so has no reason to assume any negative action has occurred.

Intensive research now shows that at the core of the human-alien interaction there is a clear pattern of deception. We know, for
instance, that “screen memories” are often used to mask an alien abduction. Such accounts abound, in which a person sees a
familiar, yet out-of-place animal, like a deer or owl, a monkey or a rabbit, and then experiences a period of missing time. The
person often awakens later to find a new, unexplained scar on his body.

Uneasiness about the encounter will persist, however, and far different memories may start to surface in dreams or flashbacks,
and then the person seeks help to explain the uneasiness. Quite often, hypnotic regression is used to uncover the events
behind the “screen memory,” and that is when a typical alien abduction surfaces.

The most recent research in which I’ve been involved has turned up yet a second sort of screening process. If it turns out to be
accurate, then thousands of abduction cases are in urgent need of re-examination.

The typical scenario of undergoing the regressive hypnosis usually results in penetration of the initial blocked memories.

The abductee then recalls an encounter, hitherto un-remembered, such as undergoing a physical examination of some sort,
perhaps having body tissues removed or having a gynecological exam. Other typical reports include the taking of sperm and
ova, of being told of an important task to be carried out, or of receiving a warning of upcoming disaster.

In most cases, both the abductee and the investigator come away from the hypnosis session feeling that they have discovered
the truth about the experience. Rationalization leads them to believe that the aliens’ purposes must be scientifically objective or
benevolent. The less threatening and more benevolent the hypnotically recalled event seems, the more satisfied are the
investigator and the abductee. “That wasn’t so bad, now, was it? These beings are our friends, or at least they are not our
enemies.” And everyone goes away with a sense of relief. I have yet to hear of a researcher who actually questions the
uncovered scenario.

However, from several recent cases, it is apparent that these recovered memories may well also be yet another screen, masking
events that are much more reprehensible. I will explain one such case, to make the point clear.

A Strange Report

A man in his late 40s came to us to explore several alien-related events in his life, and in the interview he told of a strange,
although not apparently alien-oriented episode that had haunted him since childhood. When he was ten years old, his
grandmother came to visit in his home, and since the house was small, she shared his bed on the first night of her visit.

During the night, the boy was awakened by a loud male voice. He couldn’t understand what the voice was saying, but it sounded
angry and was addressing the grandmother lying beside him.

The next morning, he asked his grandmother, “What was that voice in the bedroom last night?”

His grandmother, with tears in her eyes, pulled him tightly to her and said, “That was the devil.” She said nothing more about the
episode, but she did insist that her son take her back to her own home immediately. It was an unreasonable request, and her
son tried to talk her out of it. But the grandmother was adamant, and finally her son agreed to take her home the following day.

The entire family made the trip of over a hundred miles back to the grandmother’s farm, and within an hour of their arrival, the
grandmother suffered a massive stroke and died. Ever since that event, the man had felt a heavy burden of guilt associated with
his grandmother’s death. Yet there was no conscious reason for him to have felt that way. The entire event was poignant and
mystifying, but in all the alien encounters he had subsequently undergone, he had felt that the aliens were his friends and were
helping him by expanding his psychic abilities.

A regression session was arranged, and in the course of the hypnosis, he was asked to look at that childhood experience. What
he recalled was an abduction in which he and his grandmother were taken to a spacecraft in the company of reptilian aliens. He
remembered the aliens telling his grandmother that they were interested in learning about her knowledge of medicinal herbs,
and they offered to exchange medical information of their own.

They gave the boy and the grandmother a liquid to drink, explaining that it was beneficial and would make the grandmother feel
young and attractive again. So both of them drank the liquid, and the man remembered seeing his grandmother indeed looking
much younger. That was the extent of his recollection.

Both he and Ms. Bartholic, who was conducting the regression, were puzzled by this, because there was nothing in the episode
to account for the guilt he had felt about the grandmother’s death. So Ms. Bartholic deepened the man’s trance level and asked
him to look at it again, with much clearer vision. And what he then recalled was much more disturbing.

The abduction, at first, followed his initial recollection. But when the liquid was drunk, he now remembered a very strong feeling
of change in his body. And he saw that the grandmother didn’t actually look younger. Instead, she was placed on a table and
approached by one of the reptilian aliens who wanted to have intercourse with her. The liquid had acted as an aphrodisiac, yet
the grandmother resisted and said that since her husband’s death she would not have sex with anyone. The reptilian laughed
and disappeared from the room momentarily. When he returned, he was accompanied by a man who looked exactly like the
dead husband.

At this point, the grandmother agreed to have sex, but as the act was in progress, she suddenly realized that the image of her
dead husband was a cruel illusion. It was actually the reptilian on top of her, and she cried out in great resistance for him to
leave her alone. Once he was finished with her, he lifted up the little boy and placed him on top of the grandmother, forcing
another sex act upon the both of them.

Then the grandmother was removed from the table and the little boy was victimized himself by the reptilian, forced to have anal
and oral sex. The grandmother protested violently, pushing the reptilian away from her grandson and interposing her body
between them. “By Jesus,” she shouted, “you will not touch this boy!”

That must have been the wrong thing to say, because the reptilian became very angry and threatened her. “You will die for
that!” he told her, and the two people were returned to the bedroom from which they’d been taken. The next morning, the
grandmother told the little boy that the devil had been there the night before, and that was when she insisted upon being taken
home. And, as it turned out, she did die immediately thereafter.

This, then, was the cause of the man’s lifelong sense of guilt about her death. He had been forced to have sex with her, and her
death had followed shortly after. But none of this story would have emerged if Ms. Bartholic had done as most investigators do
and stopped the regression after uncovering the story about the exchange of medicinal knowledge.

There are other cases in our files that show a similar deception at work in the initial hypnotic recall. We cannot trust that first
memory, it is clear, for like so much else in the abduction experience, there may well be further maskings of events.

Before we allow ourselves to believe in the benevolence of the alien interaction, we should ask, do enlightened beings need to
use the cover of night to perform good deeds? Do they need to paralyze us and render us helpless to resist? Do “angels” need
to steal our fetuses? Do they need to manipulate our children’s genitals and probe our rectums? Are fear, pain and deception
consistent with high spiritual motives?

Reprinted with permission by Elton Turner and Kelt Works, Inc. This article was first published in UFO Universe, Vol. 3 No. 1,
Spring 1993. Copyright 1993. 1700 Broadway, New York, NY 10019.

_________________________________________________________________________

Encounter Phenomena Defy “Set Pattern.” All Data Must Be Considered  
by Karla Turner, Ph.D.

It is a myth that alien abductions of humans follow a set pattern or agenda. Perhaps the best-known proponent of this theory is
Budd Hopkins, who in his books made the genetics and other cross-breeding scenario familiar to the public. Yet when you read
back through those books, you’ll notice that several of the alien encounters seem to have very little apparent connection to an
interest in breeding of DNA. And even Hopkins, in the past couple of years, has had to expand his theory to include a definite
alien interest in some other things, such as pleasure and pain in humans.

Other well-known UFO researchers also harbor restrictive theories about the abduction phenomenon, Jacques Vallee, David
Jacobs, Whitley Strieber, Brad Steiger, John Lear, Raymond Fowler, Jenny Randles, Kevin Randle, John Keel and other writers
hold a diversity of intelligent, often ingenious theories, yet each makes the same error. They ignore parts of the abduction
evidence – whatever details don’t support their ideas.

Inadequate Theories

Yet it must be clear that any present theory which cannot account for all the known evidence is not acceptable. At best,
it can be misleading, especially for victims of abductions who turn to these prominent researchers seeking answers. A case in
point occurred during a conversation with a prominent researcher in 1989. In his lectures, this researcher always said that he
had certain ways of testing the validity of potential new abduction cases, and one of those ways was the presence of particular
scars on the victims’ bodies. I questioned him about a different kind of scar, one which often appeared on abductees of my own
acquaintance, and the researcher denied that such a mark showed up in his cases.

“Are you sure?” I asked incredulously. “This mark is pretty common around here, and I’d think it would show up in other places,
too. In fact I know it has.”

“No,” he insisted, shaking his head, “the only marks I find are like the ones I’ve already described.”

“And this other mark hasn’t shown up at all?” I asked.

“No.” he repeated.

“Not even once??” I persisted.

“Well,” he said reluctantly, lowering his voice, “there have been a couple of instances. That child I talked about tonight, she had
two of those marks, and I think there was another case. But they’re so rare that I have to ignore them. When you have two
hundred cases with Scar A and only two cases with Scar B, you go with the numbers.”

And that was the message he delivered, to an audience where anxious abductees were made to wonder if their anomalous
marks meant anything after all, or if, as so many of their friends seemed to think, they were delusions of a troubled mind.

No Single Pattern

In truth, however, although there are recurrent events in the abduction phenomenon, there is no single pattern or structure. And
until we know what all the events mean, we can’t afford to ignore any of them.

What is one to make, for instance, of an ET-human encounter in which two of the four aliens assisted the abductee in preparing
a roast for dinner?  Granted, other events occurred in this case, but the dinner was indeed cooked, served, and eaten by the
abductee’s family less than two hours after the ETs departed.

Other details of this encounter included the manipulation of the abductee’s neck, “for the purpose of instruction,” and a
discussion of genetically-stored memories and knowledge that can be tapped open in humans. But there was no medical exam,
no cross-breeding activity, and no warnings of coming catastrophe, all of which are events that have been used to construct
abduction theories. I know this to be true because it happened to me.

Human Duplicates

Another anomalous event involves the duplication or replacement of the human by an alien counterpart. In one instance, a
young man and his fiancee were in their car when a “shimmering force” enveloped him. He passed out, but moments later he
began to move, acting and talking entirely differently. His fiancee became terrified when he tried to drag her out into the dark
back yard, where he told her, “Something wants to see you there.” And only when a friend drove into the yard did the young
man return to normal, with no memory of his aberrant behavior during the past ten minutes.

Under hypnotic regression, the fiancee described the young man as being kept in the car while the “other one” took his form
and tried to control her. She called the “other one” a “hologram” and consistently referred to it as “it,” not “him.”  In fact, she said
she struggled to get away from “it” and back to the car where “the real” young man was still waiting.

Under separate regression, the young man recalled his version of the evening and said that at a certain point he was “turned
off” and “unplugged,” yet he couldn’t say what sort of power was then operating his body.

An even more bizarre event happened to a woman in the Southwest during her encounter. She said she was “removed” from
her body and stored in some inexplicable way, still aware, however, and able to communicate with her captors. They told her
that another entity was now using her body, that it was going through all her regular activities, and that no one would be able to
tell the difference. The day after the abduction when she returned to her job, she found that her body has indeed been at work,
even though she herself was somewhere else.

Interdimensional Being

These alien intruders apparently can behave and appear in a variety of ways. In one man’s experience, a human-looking woman
often appeared, although she claimed she was an interdimensional being whose real appearance was not what the abductee
saw. At times, she would be ‘completely there,’ and very three-dimensional, but at other times only her head would be visible, or
her head and hands.

The evidence from several cases also shows that the aliens have an odd interest in our animals, yet this is hardly mentioned in
standard abduction research. During a period of intense ET activity in my family’s life, our dog was somehow moved one night
from a fenced back yard into a locked garage. And the same dog, conversely, woke us up one morning barking in the back
yard, when it had been put in a locked garage the night before.

In both cases, these was no sign that either the gate or the garage door had been opened. The old dog was quite blind, at any
rate, and would have had trouble getting anywhere, even if both passageways had been clear.

Pet Puzzler

Transporting dogs turned up again in the case of a UFO researcher. Her dog slept outside, yet in the middle of the night she
was awakened by his wet tongue on her face. She and the dog were in her bed, but her bedroom door was still locked, as was
the outside door, and there were two other doors closed in between them.

Horses also have been moved, leaving their abductee-owners to track them down in corrals far distant from where the animals
had been locked away for the night. It’s hard to imagine the purpose of such events, yet they are part of the larger phenomenon
and must have some relevance.

There also seems to be a connection between abductions and the disappearance and appearance of possessions and other
objects. One of the more humorous episodes occurred when a researcher was visiting another city and staying as a guest in our
home. The day had been spent in work with other abductees, and that evening the group ordered Chinese food.

Preferred Utensils Appear

As we sat eating the food, the researcher remarked that she preferred eating Chinese food with chopsticks, but we didn’t have
any. After the meal, the researcher went to her room then returned moments later with a very puzzled expression, “I thought you
didn’t have any chopsticks,” she told my husband.  “And I certainly didn’t mean for you to go out and buy them!  But thank you
anyway for being so thoughtful.”  She held out a pair of chopsticks wrapped in paper and smiled.

“Where did you get those?” he asked in amazement.

“They were on my bed,” she replied. “Didn’t you put them there?”

“Of course, not!  There aren’t-weren’t-any chopsticks in the house, I promise you. And I haven’t gone anywhere!”

Other objects have appeared out of nowhere, such as metal balls falling from abductees’ bodies when they rose from their beds
the morning after an encounter. In another instance, a mother saw what looked like a white book floating horizontally in her son’s
bedroom, but when she went in, there was no book to be seen. In one abductee’s home, a fish disappeared from their aquarium,
and then it reappeared ten days later, twice as large as it had been. Within 24-hours, it died, as did all the other fish in the tank.

Women in Distress

Perhaps the most remarkable and disturbing set of cases concerning two women I know but who are unacquainted with each
other. The first woman awoke one morning to find her bed soaked with blood. It was during her menstrual cycle, yet she was
surprised to have bled so profusely as to soak through the tampon she had inserted before going to bed. When she went to the
bathroom to clean up, she could find no tampon to remove. Frantically she searched her bed, the bedroom, and finally her
entire apartment, but the tampon had disappeared. A few days later, she related the incident to me, but neither of us knew what
to make of it.

A month passed, and I received a call from the second woman, who lived far away from me. She was perplexed by an event of
the previous night and wanted to tell someone about it. This woman was having her menstrual cycle also, and the night before
had put on a sanitary pad before going to bed. Several hours later, she woke up and decided to change the pad, as she was an
unusually heavy bleeder. In surprise, however, she found the pad was spotless, and then she felt something inside her. She told
me that she removed the tampon, but couldn’t understand how it had gotten there. “I haven’t used tampons in ten years,” she
said, “so this doesn’t make any sense.”

Anomalies in ‘Typical’ Reports

Anomalies have turned up in some cases that might otherwise seem to follow the “typical” abduction sequence of going in the
ship, undergoing an examination and being returned with little or no memory. Sometimes, for instance, the surroundings in the
ship are described as messy or dirty, with foul odors and signs of sloppy housekeeping. Sometimes the interior is said to be
crowded, buzzing with numerous entities engaged in rapid, inexplicable movements from place to place.

Even more unusual are those accounts of abduction to inner space rather than outer space. In these cases, abductees tell of
being taken into large underground complexes, and their descriptions very often include earthly – perhaps military – apparatus
as well as the presence of both humans and aliens working together. These underground areas are reached through long
vertical or corkscrewing tunnels, the abductees say, and in one case the place looked like a movie set of an old Western town.

Bathroom Settings

A third anomalous episode, which may have taken place aboard a craft or in an underground setting, involves abductees taken
into “bathroom” settings. There they are made to get into stalls with or without toilets, and in most cases the abductees are
thoroughly frightened by the events that occur in these surroundings, often having to do with examination of their sexual organs.

Most of these anomalous details have come from a relatively small group of abductees, yet similar cases are known elsewhere.
In the instances of the odd scar, which began this discussion, there are cases of the triangular pattern turning up all over the
world, yet no prominent researcher has acknowledged this. The scoop marks and straight-line cuts are well known, but just as
frequent are less permanent scars and marks. Single, double and multiple puncture marks appear on abductees’ bodies, as do
wide paths of subcutaneous purplish smears, triangles and other shapes made by skin discoloration rather than punctures, and
long claw-mark, scratches, usually numerous, accompanied by even longer welts of unbroken skin.

Challenge To Positive Theories

As to researchers who claim that the ETs are here to help us evolve some higher consciousness or that they are here for some
other positive purpose-saving our planet, promoting world peace, etc.-I challenge those researches to incorporate anomalous
data in this view.

What about those people who suffer total breakdowns after their experiences?  What about those who undergo wild personality
changes, who find themselves obsessed with deviant sexual behavior they never had before, often leading to the breakup of
marriages and friendships?  These things have happened numerous times, but no researcher has yet explained the higher
purpose behind such results.

Particularly disturbing are those cases where previously healthy individuals have an ET encounter and then develop debilitating
or terminal illnesses. It is well known that many women suffer gynecological problems after their experiences, often leading to
hysterectomies. But other instances have shown the development of severe fatigue, horrible swelling and itching, and even
cancer. Where are the positive effects in these cases?

Theories are starting places for research, not proven conclusions, and UFO researchers must be willing to expand and alter
their pet theories according to the data they uncover. It would be wonderful if we could shape ET experiences into something
positive, but until the details of abduction encounters – all the details – are given serious consideration, I think it’s dangerous to
cling to theories that ignore data that will not fit. We owe it to ourselves to seek the whole truth.

Reprinted By Permission by 1 This article was originally published in UFO magazine, Vol. 8 No. 1 January/February 1993.

————————————————————————————————-

Genetic Agenda A Double-Cross?
By Karla K. Turner, Ph.D.

The seminal work of Budd Hopkins first showed recurrent reproductive procedures performed on abductees aboard UFOs or in
alien facilities. And since the reports gathered by subsequent researchers confirmed this data, it has become a “given,”-  a fact
of ufology, that the primary purpose of alien contact is to crossbreed or hybridize a new version of either the aliens themselves
or of us.

But is this a solid fact, a safe assumption?  The evidence upon which this assumption is based is three-fold. First, reports say
that genetic and reproductive material are

being harvested from abductees. Second, abductees say the aliens have implanted fetuses into them and then later retrieved
the fetuses. Finally, the reports include scenarios involving the “fetal nursery” and the presentation of a hybrid-looking baby or
child to the abductee, typically with claims that the baby is the offspring of the abductee.

All of this evidence comes from abduction accounts, remembered both consciously and under regressive hypnosis. To date,
however, there is no actual hybrid child in human custody, so the entire “fact” is based solely on encounter reports. The
accuracy of these reports is questionable, given the nature of the abduction scenario. In every encounter, the human’s total
perceptive intake is controlled and frequently altered, easily manipulated to give the human a “created” event to remember and
a programmed set of tactile, emotional, and intellectual responses. That means that what we abductees think and what we
remember of encounters may not accurately reflect the real events of the encounter.

Some researchers insist on accepting abduction accounts at face value, however, but even if we grant the veracity of the
reports, there are still problems with accepting the “fact” of a crossbreeding agenda. There are other feasible explanations for
the data used to support the hybridization theory that should be considered.

First, the genetic material harvested from abductees could be intended for some other use than an upgraded alien species. For
instance, totally human clones, typically naked and inert or inactive, are reported by abductees. The genetic materials could be
used in their production.

Another possibility is that, as some abductees report being told or shown, the small Gray “workers” are mass-produced android
robots, not soul-bearing individuals and thus not “alive” as we understand the term. The Grays show a strong fetal physiology,
as numerous descriptions have stated. And given enough mastery of genetics, human reproductive material could be altered so
that its appearance resembled the Gray type, yet be strictly human in composition, rather than a mixture of alien and human.
The Grays, in effect, could be grossly altered bodies of human babies, devoid of what we call soul and mentally programmed
like dedicated computer hardware.

Similarly, the reported fetuses could be intended for non-crossbreeding purposes, notably the same ones just discussed.
Remember, there is no hard evidence that the fetuses are actually made from any alien-human combination, only an
assumption based on outward appearances and the pronouncements of the aliens.

The reports of temporary fetal implantations into abductees, by the way, are reproductively odd, to say the least. There are
some reports of male abductees receiving fetal implants, one in the abdomen and another rectally. Both implants were later
retrieved, just as in the cases of female abductees. Even prepubescent children are reported to have received fetal implants.

There is also evidence that the fetuses, whatever their origin, are not always treated as if they were precious experiments vital
to the survival of either our race or the aliens. In a few instances, abductees report watching as aliens deliberately destroy
fetuses in the “fetal nursery” scenario. In one instance, the abductee was told that she shouldn’t be upset because the fetus was
not really alive, and that all its physical material would be used, not wasted. In another instance, the abductee was actually told
that the reproductive work and the fetuses were used in the manufacture of the Gray workers. She was told that the aliens were
also preparing “workers” for a coming time of destruction, because they would need workers who were devoid of emotion.

And the “baby presentations” have other possible interpretations other than the nurturing of the hybrid offspring, which is what
the aliens typically claim. It might indeed be an actual event, but the baby could be a strictly human product, not a crossbreed.
The purpose here might not be for a bonding process, since many abductees say they don’t feel any maternal connection to the
baby. One woman said she didn’t believe the event was for bonding at all, but rather was a tormenting process meant to be
emotionally traumatic for the “parent,” as part of some programming agenda.

On the other hand, the presentation might not be real at all. It could be a virtual reality scenario. In such a case, the baby might
be something else altogether, or purely a projected image with no physical reality. The event might be designed to give us
disinformation, misleading us about the true nature of their genetics agenda and, indeed, about the true nature of our
relationship and worth to the aliens. If the agenda would seem reprehensible to us, it would certainly serve their purposes to
keep us ignorant of it and to give us instead a more acceptable “cover story.”

To muddy the waters even further, the aliens have indicated four contradictory explanations for the genetics work. First, they
have said it was necessary to upgrade their declining race. They have also said that it is necessary to alter the human species
so it can survive some future destruction scenario. Third, they have told some abductees that they are here serving God’s plan,
by preparing “New Bodies” for the coming Resurrection and return of Christ. And finally, they have said they are producing
clones of certain individuals, with which those individuals could be replaced.

Given the alternative possible explanations and the large body of counter- indicative data, as well as the conflicting explanations
offered by the aliens, can we safely accept hybridization as the primary purpose at the heart of the alien agenda?  Or should we
be more skeptical about their avowed intentions?The evidence shows that the aliens do harvest from us in a number of ways,
emotionally and energetically as well as physically. There are even reported scenarios of facilities in which human bodies are
“processed,” and many such reports come from people unfamiliar with ufological literature.

If we are indeed a multipurpose resource for the aliens, one which they want to continue to use, could they be performing the
various reproductive/genetic procedures in order to make alterations in their “livestock” that better serve the uses for which we
are harvested?  Such a possibility should not be ruled out. There are hypothetical reasons why these alterations might be
necessary at this particular time.

If the aliens know, for example, that upcoming catastrophes or earth changes will be vastly destructive of their herd, they could
be working furiously to store up supplies in advance of the dearth, and also perhaps trying to produce a variant human more
capable of surviving in some new environment on this planet. The aliens, in fact, are fond of making predictions of catastrophic
earth changes, although they usually insist their genetic intrusions are altruistic, for our benefit.

Consider this: What if the aliens realize that their herd is showing changes that the aliens didn’t intend and don’t like? They
could be furiously working to stem this transformative process. They may fear that the herd is waking up, gaining new perceptive
abilities, and learning that its purpose is nothing more than livestock. After all, the herd might be so unhappy with that situation
that they might decide to resist it. What would be the alien response to such a situation? If all the livestock we use on this planet
suddenly woke up and decided they didn’t want to “serve Man” any longer, would humans acquiesce quietly and become
vegetarians?

Reprinted with permission by Elton Turner and Kelt Works, Inc. This article was originally published in The MUFON UFO Journal,
#320  December 1994.

————————————————————————————————-

Alien Behavior: Concept or Precept?
By Elton Turner

“186,000 M/Second – it’s not just a good idea, it’s the law,” the bumper sticker read. Something about that statement irritated
me. Here we were in the midst of a UFO conference and someone was selling an old reality!

The mixture of our notions of physical reality and our concept of law are keeping us in the dark ages of human thought. Modern
science has brought us many new ideas about the nature of the universe, but those ideas are constantly being challenged and
changed as our powers of observation sharpen and equipment improves. I thank our scientists for their contributions;  I love air
conditioning, airplanes, and the television waves that travel our air. What bothers me, is that we have not stopped to consider,
“The Law.”

What laws do the invaders (and I use that term intentionally) of our world abide by? I posit that we have no idea of the rules of
the navigable universe by which these otherworldly entities operate. We continue to develop ideas of their intentions based on
our own social rules and written laws. I asked a prominent author and researcher of the UFO phenomenon the other day why he
thought the aliens could be trusted – why we should believe what they tell us. His reply was sincere, I think. He said they have
demonstrated their truthfulness by predicting some future events, and, lo and behold, what they said came true. He said they
have told us our planet is in ecological crisis and we know that is true. And, although they seem to have been here for
thousands of years, they have not invaded us. What wonderful creatures they must be!

In the few years that I have been studying my own personal invasion by these creatures, I have come to understand that the
invaders do not tell the truth unless it serves THEIR purpose. They play on our fears, using pollution, war, nuclear holocaust
and greed as backdrops for their warnings. But every day since I was a small child, I have been aware that those things are part
of our world. We all know these things. It does not take a zillion-plus-IQ creature from the planet Orlon to make me aware that we
have problems in our world that we must face. We have very human problems to deal with – problems that we can deal with.

The problems we cannot yet overcome is that of outside interference in our affairs. Some people may call it “benevolent
intervention” and point to positive results. I respect the scientists and laymen of all disciplines who have been studying the alien
phenomenon and artifacts for the past 50 or 60 years. It appears that they have made some progress, as witnessed by the
rapid developments in the aerospace industry, medicine, communications, etc., a great deal of which seems to have come from
such research. What is missing is a thorough and public study of the mission and rules of engagement in the war for our world.

I believe that our very thoughts and consequently, our behavior as a race of sentient beings are being UNDERMINED through
the power of insinuation and the implantation of controlling devices in our bodies by non-human (most of the time) entities. This
is truly the most effective way to invade and conquer. I do not trust such creatures no matter what I have been told about their
altruistic motives.

We, as a race, have never been free to discover our own true identity. Every social advance we attempt is thwarted by some
maniac who springs up with almost divine grace to lead us into madness. Saint Paul, for instance, seems to have taken the real
message of Jesus and his earliest followers and distorted it into something that we kill, lie and cheat for. And, in spite of all that,
we still aspire for redemption of our souls. The followers of that doctrine – Christians, they call themselves – are not the only
ones who behave in such a manner. Every major religion has managed to find an excuse in its teachings to destroy non-
believing fellow human beings. A part of me shudders every time I hear of yet another killing based on 2000-year-old hatreds.

What law allows us to continue with such atrocities? What influence keeps such hatred and fears alive? Why are we abductees
so afraid to ask for real help from our own society?

We have been INVADED – but I do not yet believe that the battle is over. Invasion with sticks, knives or guns is a human reality,
not necessarily a universal one. There are very sophisticated mechanisms being used in the invasion of our world. Why should
our invaders use pointed sticks against us when they can get us to sharpen sticks and use them against each other? We
provide them with everything they want from us, and they take none of the blame for our misery. They just zip around in their
wonderful flying machines, dazzling us with their magical abilities and filling us with awe at their insight.

Can there be a more successful military campaign than one in which no shot is (apparently) fired and in which the conquered
populace gladly and openly welcomes their enslavers? We are being programmed mentally and socially to accept our invaders
as saviors, not a conquering force. I truly believe we are being deceived by smoke, mirrors and sleight-of-three-fingered-hand
movements. Are we going to sell our birthright to some sneaky beings who appear on our shores in marvelous ships and offer
us a few glitzy baubles?

The researcher asked if I personally knew of harm that has come to anyone at the hands of, or because of, the aliens. Yes,
harm has come. My early youth was damaged severely by the unconscious knowledge that I was being used by some non-
human agency. It took me 40 years to recognize that the fears which guided me daily were not of my own making and that the
rebellion I constantly felt was engendered by my contempt for the powerful invisible agents that forced me to do things that I
knew were wrong, even as I was doing them.

For example, I did not want to marry the person who became my first wife, yet I had no control over the decision. Before we were
married, we were jointly abducted and subjected to severe programming. The results brought no happiness to either of us. We
both starved for love and companionship, even though we tried with all our might to find them. My son (now 25) was also one of
their subjects, and is miserable and lost. He is an artistic person with so many unknowable fears that he is paralyzed. I know of
abductees MURDERED by mutilations (reports of which are suppressed immediately and completely), by cancers that no
physician has ever seen before, and by madness that has led to suicide. In my opinion, these acts were not caused by
“brothers” of any sort.

I do not believe that all is lost, however. I have felt a guiding hand that helped me to discover happiness and inner peace amid
all this chaos and misery. What I have come to understand is that that hand is only there when I take responsibility for my own
happiness and do something about whatever is bothering me.

Reality left in the hands of the invaders is neither what we need nor what we want. It is time that we think hard about ourselves
and what we have on this gem of the universe, our home – our planet. There are laws governing the actions of our invaders,
rules guiding their actions and patterns of behavior we can discover if we will make a concerted effort to discern them. We
humans have something valuable that is desirable to, and usable by the alien forces acting on us. I feel it is time we take back
that which is ours, that we use all our resources to discover the laws that govern reality and become the beings that we
intrinsically know we are.

Reprinted with permission by Elton Turner and Kelt Works, Inc. This article was originally published in Contact Forum,
September/October, 1994.

————————————————————————————————-

Karla Kandace Turner, Ph.D. was a highly respected abduction researcher, author, lecturer, and teacher. She received her
Bachelor’s degree from the University of California in Sacramento, a Master’s degree from the University of Nottingham,
Nottingham England, and her Ph.D. from the University of North Texas in Denton. She authored three books about the
abduction phenomenon: Into The Fringe, Taken, and Masquerade of Angels.

In 1995, Karla contracted a very dangerous form of breast cancer immediately following an abduction experience. She lost her
battle with cancer on January 9, 1996 at the age of 48. Karla has been greatly missed by those her knew her and by the many
people she helped through her books and research. Karla Turner, Ph.D. Memorial website