A Wholistic and Futuristic Perspective
James Gilliland
FAIR USE NOTICE: This
page may contain
copyrighted material the
use of which has not been
specifically authorized by
the copyright owner. This
website distributes this
material without charge to
those who are interested
in receiving the included
information for research
and educational purposes.
We believe this constitutes
a fair use of any such
copyrighted material as
provided for in 17 U.S.C §
107.
UFO
Researchers
More UFOlogy
UFOLOGY
© 2008 - 2016 Nadine Lalich  
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
UFOlogy
The acronym UFO - for Unidentified Flying Object - is so prevalent and commonplace today, that
it's easy to forget the term is only about fifty years old. There is even some dispute about the
acronym's exact origin. In his classic account of his years spent as the director of Project Blue Book
- the Air Force's official UFO "investigation" agency - Capt. Edward J. Ruppelt says unequivocally
that "UFO is the official term that I created to replace the words 'flying saucers'" (Report on
Unidentified Flying Objects, Doubleday, 1956, p. 6). Presumably, this would have been sometime
between 1951, when Ruppelt took over Project Grudge, later renamed Blue Book, and September
of 1953, when he left the agency and the Air Force. Elsewhere in the same book, however, Ruppelt
titled 'Unidentified Flying Objects - Project Grudge, Technical Report No. 102-AC-49/15-100. But it
was widely referred to as the Grudge Report." This would mean that some long forgotten
anonymous Air Force staffer coined the phrase at least two years before Ruppelt did. But perhaps
Ruppelt is only claiming credit for the coinage of the acronym itself?
At any rate, UFO has now entered into common usage and appears in most dictionaries, along with
ufology, the study of UFOs, and ufologist, one who studies UFOs. In many ways, the term is a
"loaded" one in that it implies classification or designation prior to a proper analysis or thorough
extraterrestrial manufacture and origin. In reality, well over 90 percent of all reported UFOs prove to
be IFOs - Identified Flying Objects - upon investigation. IFOs can be anything from distant airplane
landing lights to the planet Venus, with ball lightning, weather balloons, and other astronomical and
In strictest terms, a UFO is just that - an apparent unidentified flying object, origin unknown. The
best scientifically accepted definition of a UFO is probably that provided by the late astronomer J.
Allen Hynek, who said that the UFO is simply "the reported perception of an object or light seen in
the sky or upon the land the appearance, trajectory, and general dynamic and luminescent
behavior of which do not suggest a logical, conventional explanation and which is not only
mystifying to the original percipients but remains unidentified after close scrutiny of all available
evidence by persons who are technically capable of making a common sense identification, if one is
possible." (The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry by J. Allen Hynek, Henry Regnery, Chicago,
1972, p. 10.) For more than 20 years, Hynek was the Air Force's astronomy consultant to Project
Blue Book and its predecessors, up until the former's closing on December 17, 1969. A few years
afterwards, Hynek formed the Center for UFO Studies that now bears his name. He also contributed
two other terms - one inadvertently and one purposefully - to the popular lexicon: "swamp gas" and
"Close Encounters of the Third Kind."

Shortly before the UFO there was the flying saucer. On June 24th, 1947, private pilot Kenneth
Arnold was winging his way near Mt. Rainier in Washington state, when he spied nine, shiny
crescent-shaped objects at some distance and traveling at speeds he estimated to be well over
1,000 mph, far in advance of any known terrestrial craft of the time, the new jet technology
included. Arnold told Associated press reporter Bill Bequette that the objects behaved like a rock or
saucer skipping across water. An anonymous headline writer then coined the phrase "flying
saucers" to describe what Arnold had seen, even though the objects he reported were crescent,
not saucer, shaped.

By any name, however, flying saucers and UFOs have continued to puzzle us in the half-century
since the end of WWII. Once regarded as almost exclusively an American phenomenon, like
hamburgers and baseball, UFOs have now been reported from virtually every country in the world.
No classification or category of humanity, from the average man or woman in the street, to
physicists and astronomers, is immune to the UFO phenomenon. According to a
several-decades-old Gallup Poll, more than ten million American adults alone are estimated to have
seen what they believed to be a UFO, a phenomenon that most skeptics routinely dismiss as
non-existent by definition. In reality, whatever that reality is, UFOs are arguably the most widely
reported unexplained mystery of this or any other century.

Although the modern UFO era is typically dated to Arnold's landmark 1947 sighting, there is
tantalizing evidence that the heavens have long been inhabited by similar "apparitions" and
manifestations, even when there weren't handy words with which to describe them. The collected
books of Charles Fort (1874-1932), sometimes considered the father of ufology, run to 1062
pages. In the whole, there is but a single illustration, a line drawing on page 280 of The Book of the
Damned (his first book) that accompanies an account Fort culled from the pages of the Journal of
the Royal Meteorological Society. The account was an extract from the log of Capt. F. W. Banner
aboard the bark Lady of the Lake, dated March 22nd, 1870.

Sailors had seen a remarkable object, or "cloud," which they reported to the ship's captain.
"According to Capt. Banner," Fort wrote, "it was a cloud of circular form, with an included semicircle
far outward, and then curving backward."

The thing was light gray in color and much lower than the other clouds. It "traveled from a point at
about 20 degrees above the horizon to a point about 80 degrees above," moving from the south,
southeast, where it first appeared, to the northeast, traveling against the wind. "For half an hour
this form was visible," writes Fort. "When it did finally disappear [it] was not because it
disintegrated like a cloud, but because it was lost to sight in the evening darkness."

Aside from the extraordinary duration - most UFO sightings are a matter of minutes or seconds -
this 1870 event replicates many of the characteristics common to UFO sightings more than a
century later. These include the circular shape, the gray, metallic color and the ability to travel
against the wind, which would seemingly rule out such mundane sources as weather balloons and
- the skeptics' favorite - airborne hoaxes of a hot-air nature, i.e., kites or plastic bags with candles
attached. Needless to say, any reliable 1870 or earlier sighting would also rule out the easy IFO
"explanations" of airplane landing lights, satellites, advertising blimps and so on.

While it is true that rumor, speculation and tabloid sensationalism surround the UFO subject, it is
with the collection, analysis and verification, as far as possible, of sober reports like the above that
MUFON and other responsible UFO organizations are most concerned. The phenomenon can and
should be approched dispassionately and scientifically from a variety of angles, perceptual,
psychological and sociological, to name but a few. If objects from another planet are indeed
visiting ours, what form of propulsion system and other technologies are employed? What kinds of
biological lifeforms might be onboard? What God or gods will they worship? And how will UFO
occupants - now or in the future, immediate or remote - perceive humans: as mental, emotional
and spiritual equals or as vastly subpar inferiors? Should the skeptics prove right, in a
"worst-case" scenario, and UFOs turn out out to be nothing more than a convoluted space age
myth of our own making, surely our perceptions of the UFO phenomenon will tell us much about
the contents and inner working, the built-in "plumbing" of the human mind and perhaps
consciousness itself? In either event - including other scenarios and potential explanations as yet
unformulated - many unanswered questions remain. It can hardly be against human nature, or the
scientific method in principle, to ask and to seek answers to those questions. We welcome your
assistance!

Dennis Stacy, Former Editor, MUFON UFO Journal